1. How would statehood be achieved? The legislative path toward Statehood is simple. The process has been followed through to completion 37 times since the first 13 colonies formed their union. A territory must petition the Congress, draft a constitution with a republican form of government, Congress must approve by a simple majority, and the President must sign the bill. A constitutional amendment requires a two-thirds vote of Congress as well the support of three-quarters of the state legislatures. In other words, 13 states can veto a constitutional amendment. The last time a voting rights amendment was circulated, less than half the required states approved it within the seven year time limit. A constitutional amendment may be repealed. Statehood cannot be repealed.

2. Isn’t DC Statehood unconstitutional? No, the constitution states that the capital city shall not exceed 100 square miles but sets no lower limit in size. Additionally, the Constitution is silent about the location of the Capital City and it was left to the Organic Act of 1801 to set the specific location of the city. Provided that no land is taken from a state without its consent then it would be constitutional for New Columbia to become a state while the federal District would remain as a small portion of the current city consisting mainly of the mall, the Capitol, the White House, and military bases.

Here are the sections of the Constitution that relate to the District and to Statehood:

Ariticle I Section 8-To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;

Article IV Section 3-New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress. The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.

3. What about Congress’ power over the District? The Constitution states the upper size limit of the district over which it has power; it does not state the lower limit. The size of the District has been changed in the past, most significantly when the Virginia portion was retroceded to that state. DC statehood would require a simple reduction of the size of the federal district to an unpopulated area which includes the Capitol, the Mall, the Smithsonian museums, the White House, some surrounding federal office buildings, and the military installations along the Anacostia River.

4. Isn’t statehood impractical? No, we’ve created a new state 85 percent as frequently as we have elected a new president.

The District is the only political and geographical entity within the United States whose citizens bear the responsibilities of government without sharing in the appropriate privileges of government. District citizens bear all the burden of citizenship, but do not share the most cherished right of citizenship—full representation in the Congress. In addition to paying federal taxes, District residents also pay local taxes, and are subject to all the laws of the United States as well as treaties made with foreign governments.

The United States is the only nation in the world with a representative, democratic constitution that denies voting representation in the national legislature to the citizens of the capital.

In 2016, 86% of D.C. voters approved a referendum in support of D.C. statehood. The referendum verified a new state name (Washington, D.C.); approved borders for the state; confirmed we’d have a republican form of government; and approved a state constitution. The 2016 Statehood referendum met the four constitutional requirements to be admitted as a state. The people of D.C. are now working to pressure Congress and the President to pass statehood legislation so we can become the 51st state in the union.

5. Why is statehood important to me and my family? Statehood is the route that would give the District (to be named Washington, D.C. but where D.C. stands for Douglass Commonwealth after Frederick Douglass) complete autonomy over its budget which would prevent the social engineering experiments Congress like to impose on the District every few years. Congress, because it does presently have authority over the District often experiments with pet programs here by forcing it on us because they cannot force it in their own home states.

Statehood would also finally grant us 2 US Senators, unlike previous compromise options to give us one member of the House. The US Senate was set up to give small states and equal voice with large state in the 2 houses of Congress. The Senate advises and gives consent to presidential appointments to both the federal government and federal courts. For over 200 years we have had no say, no vote, in any federal judge’s appointment including the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has final say over what laws are or are not constitutional, laws with which we have to live by, and yet we have not had the votes to give advice and consent on these nominations.

As the federal budget is negotiated, plans for Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security are negotiated we deserve 2 votes in the Senate to say whether or not our tax dollars should be spent in certain ways. The Senate is where the citizens of New Columbia will have our voice on national policies that affect our present daily lives and the policies that will affect our children.

6. Why bother, if it hasn’t happened yet is Statehood really going to happen? It will happen we just need to be organized. In the 1970s the equal representation constitutional amendment passed both houses of Congress with 2/3 majority votes; statehood only needs 50% in each house plus the President’s signature

7. Isn’t the District “too urban and too liberal” to be a state? There is no litmus test in the constitution for demographic make-up of an area for admission as a state and the 14th Amendment explicitly prevents discrimination based on race

8. Why not recede back into Maryland? Neither DC nor Maryland wants this so why do it; it would drastically change the political make-up of Maryland diluting its traditional power bases (especially Baltimore). Additionally, both the Prince Georges and Montgomery County Councils adopted a resolution in support of DC Statehood. These are the two MD counties adjacent to DC. The resolutions expressed support for the commercial and residential portions of the District to become the 51st State.

9. Isn’t DC too small to be a state? No, there is no standard for geographic size in the Constitution that would limit a territory being admitted as a state. Additionally, the District has more people than Wyoming and Vermont and pays more federal taxes than 22 states. With a fast growing population DC is on course to pass several states in population by the census in 2030.

10. Isn’t the District is so heavily subsidized by the federal government that it would go broke as a state? No, the District receives 25% of its budget from the federal government which as a percentage is less than 5 other states and is on par with 3 other states. Statehood would allow the District to tap other potential revenue stream which Congress presently prevents. Here’s a good article on District finances compared to the other states from Greater Greater Washington: http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/11051/how-much-federal-money-does-dc-actually-get/

The US Census Bureau calculates the total federal funds transferred to state and local governments, and the total revenues collected in each state. The latest available figures (2008) reveal that Mississippi leads the nation with 35% of its combined state and local budget revenue coming from the federal government. Louisiana is a close second at 34%, followed by New Mexico and South Dakota at 27% each. The District government receives the same percentage of federal funds as Alabama, Montana, Vermont, and West Virginia. In all, 8 states receive as much or more aid than the District.

11. Given the District’s past and present issues with corruption isn’t it too corrupt to be a state? There is corruption in every state. Illinois has 3 out of its last 4 governors serving federal prison sentences on corruption convictions. There are unethical and criminals at all levels of government across the country from Harry Thomas Jr. to Richard Nixon.

12. Do District residents even want statehood? Over 86% of District voters approved a resolution in support of D.C. statehood in 2016.

13. Does the District have enough land to tax to be financially viable and independent? Yes it does. Although the District is hindered by federal and international presence since they are tax exempt the city has still balanced 20 budgets in a row without much federal contributions.

5 Responses to FAQ’S

  1. Pingback: Capital Proximity | Neighbors United for DC Statehood

  2. Danny W says:

    The United States is the only nation in the world with a representative, democratic constitution that denies voting representation in the national legislature to the citizens of the capital. Wrong we have a constitutional representative REPUBLIC. NOT A DEMOCRATIC.

  3. Pingback: Moving to Washington D.C.? Here's your survival guide.lindsaydahl.com

  4. Bill says:

    I am all for the residents of the District of Columbia having full Congressional representation, but not as a single-city state. I would rather that the District be absorbed into either Maryland or Virginia. And my reason is singular: relative population size. Representation of U.S. citizens in the U.S. Senate is extremely distorted, in consideration of population distribution among the several states. D.C. statehood would only further exacerbate this problem.

    The District of Columbia, at about 646 thousand residents, is more populous than two U.S. states, Vermont and Wyoming. However, the average U.S. state has a population of about 6.3 million people, and the populations of Vermont (admitted as the 14th state in 1791) and Wyoming (admitted as the 44th state in 1890) are each just under one-tenth of that. Yet, every state gets two U.S. Senators, from the most populous, California, with a population of around 38.3 million (about 12.2 percent of the U.S. total state population), to the least populous, Wyoming, with a population of around 583 thousand (about 0.18 percent of the U.S. total state population). Each California U.S. Senator directly represents about 65.8 times as many people as each Wyoming U.S. Senator, but a California Senator’s vote carries equal weight in Congress to that of a Wyoming Senator. There are only 17 U.S. states which have greater than average population size (least populous among them being Tennessee at about 6.5 million), while there are 21 states in the U.S. that have population sizes of less than half of the state average. Eleven (11) U.S. states have population sizes less than one-quarter of the state average (most populous among them being Hawaii at about 1.4 million). About 26.8 percent of the U.S. state population is represented by California, Texas, and New York, which combine for 6 U.S. Senators, or 6 percent of the U.S. Senate. Meanwhile, about 24.2 percent of the U.S. state population is represented by the 30 least populous U.S. states, which combine for 60 U.S. Senators, or 60 percent of the U.S. Senate. About 51 percent of the U.S. state population is represented by the 9 most populous U.S. states and their combined 18 U.S. Senators, who make up 18 percent of the U.S. Senate. Meanwhile, the other 49 percent of the U.S. state population is represented by the 41 least populous U.S. states and their combined 82 U.S. Senators, who make up 82 percent of the U.S. Senate. The 25 most populous U.S. states represent about 83.7 percent of the U.S. state population, while the 25 least populous U.S. states represent about 16.3 percent of the U.S. state population. Each group of 25 accounts for half of the U.S. Senate. The 10 least populous U.S. states (Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Montana, Delaware, South Dakota, Alaska, North Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming), combine for 20 percent of the U.S. Senate representation, while comprising about 3 percent of the U.S. state population. The population sizes of Delaware, South Dakota, Alaska, North Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming are each less than those of the 50 most-populous U.S. COUNTIES, which include Wake County, North Carolina (seat of Raleigh), and the 10 most-populous U.S. CITIES, which include San Jose, California. When people scratch their heads in wonder over how it is that policies which have broad national support fail to gain traction in the U.S. Senate, the foregoing is a huge factor among many. Eighteen (18) U.S. Senators from 9 states representing about 51 percent of the U.S. state population can be effectively neutralized by 18 different U.S. Senators from 9 states representing about 2.5 percent of the U.S. state population.

    However good this might be for state parity in the Senate, this is bad for national popular democracy. If the District of Columbia became part of Maryland, Maryland would rise from the 19th most populous state to the 17th, with about 6.6 million residents. If D.C. became part of Virginia, Virginia would possibly rise from the 12th most populous state to the 11th, with about 8.9 million residents. Either of these options would be preferable to me than D.C. statehood, with a smaller population size than Denver, Colorado, or a population size about one-thirteenth that of New York, New York. And I say this as a Democratic voter, a supporter of U.S. Congressional Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, and a former D.C. student resident for 8 years.

  5. Mary says:

    I do believe that on a per capita basis DC receives a much higher rate of federal funds than the other states. My concern is that funding goes away and DC increases taxes on those trying to save to purchase a home even behind the ridiculous rate they do already. And corruption is a major concern…stop electing criminals and maybe the DC government will start to earn some respect

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s